ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) show a high prevalence of sleep problems. Adding to these problems, another factor appeared two years ago: the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives of this study were to describe the sleep quality and habits in a sample of EMTs in Spain during COVID-19 pandemic considering the factors related to them. METHODS: A national cross-sectional study was carried out in Spain between October 2020 and February 2021. EMTs who worked in basic and advanced life support ambulances were invited to participate in an online survey. Several sociodemographic variables were analyzed, as well as sleep quality, stress symptoms, pain, food consumption and physical activity. Logistic regression models were used to examine the associations between these variables and sleep quality. RESULTS: 340 EMTs participated in the study. Of them, 59.4% had poor sleep quality and the habits of 32.2% got worse during the pandemic. The EMTs with a poor sleep quality presented in higher proportion stress symptoms (OR: 4.19;95% CI: 2.16-8.11;p<0.001), pain (OR: 3.19;95% CI: 1.7-6.01;p<0.001) and a weekly consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages greater than two glasses (OR: 3.6;95% CI: 1.86-6.98;p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EMTs show a high prevalence of poor sleep quality, which got worse during the pandemic. The factors related to them are stress, pain and consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. This study provides important information so that the emergency services can develop health promotion programs focused on these professionals.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Field hospitals, also known as alternative care sites, have been an important healthcare reinforcement during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic worldwide. In the Valencian Community, three of these hospitals were opened, one for each province. Our study aimed to make a comprehensive analysis of this resource in Castellon. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried out with an analytical and statistical component of 3 aspects: infrastructure, satisfaction and clinical data from COVID-positive hospitalized patients. The sources of information were primary, institutional for the infrastructure and personal for the satisfaction surveys and clinical data. RESULTS: A set of 6x3 metres polyvalent tents was chosen, which joined formed a single-floor area of about 3.500 m2. Although hospital opened for approximately a year and a half with multiple uses, most in relation to the COVID pandemic (vaccination center, emergency room observation, hospital assistance, warehouse...), reception of positive patients for the virus began during the third wave of the pandemic, remaining active for eleven days. A total of thirty-one patients with a mean age of 56 years were admitted. 41.9% did not have any comorbidity and 54.8% needed treatment with oxygen therapy. Furthermore, the length of stay was three days, finding a significant relationship between this one, the oxygen flow required during admission and the age. Satisfaction was measured by a survey of seventeen questions where an average satisfaction of 8.33/10. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the few studies in the literature in which a field hospital is analyzed from such different points of view. After this analysis, it is concluded that it is an extraordinary and temporary resource whose use is useful without reflecting an increase of morbidity/mortality among our patients and with a very favorable subjective assessment.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 has tried out global health causing high mortality. There are some risk factors that associate greater severity and mortality from COVID-19;but their individual impact is unknown yet. There are also no fixed criteria for hospital admission. For this reason, this study aimed to analyze the factors associated with the severity of COVID-19 and create predictive models for the risk of hospitalization and death due to COVID-19. METHODS: A descriptive retrospective cohort study was made in Talavera de la Reina (Toledo, Spain). Data were collected through computerized records of Primary Care, Emergencies and Hospitalization. The sample consisted of 275 patients over eighteen years old diagnosed with COVID-19 in a centralized laboratory from March 1st to May 31st, 2020. Analysis was carried on using SPSS, creating two predictive models for the risk of hospitalization and death using linear regression. RESULTS: The probability of hospitalization increased independently with polypharmacy (OR 1.086;CI95% 1.009-1.169), the Charlson index (OR 1.613;CI95% 1.158-2.247), the history of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (OR 4.358;95% CI 1.114-17.051) and the presence of COVID symptoms (OR 7.001;95% CI 2.805-17.475). The probability of death was independently associated with age, increasing 8.1% (OD 1.081;95% CI 1.054- 1.110) for each year of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity, polypharmacy, history of AMI and the presence of COVID-19 symptoms predict the risk of hospitalization. The age of individuals predicts the risk of death. Detecting patients at high risk of hospitalization and death allows us to define the target population and define measures to implement.
ABSTRACT
International medical conferences aim to improve health outcomes, but the associated air travel-related carbon emissions are a significant contributor to the environmental impact of medical scientific activities. The COVID-19 pandemic has urged the medical world to shift towards virtual conferences, decreasing associated carbon emissions by 94% to 99%. However, virtual conferences are still not the norm and doctors are returning to business as usual. Various stakeholders need to be mobilized to minimize carbon-intensive flights to conferences. Doctors, (academic) hospitals, conference organizers and universities all hold a responsibility to incorporate every effort to decarbonize and build climate mitigation into their decisions. These efforts include sustainable travel policies, selecting accessible venues, decentralizing host locations, encouraging low carbon alternatives to air travel, increasing virtual attendance and increasing awareness.
ABSTRACT
The current COVID-19 pandemic has generated a relevant changes in the normal development of human performance. Some changes detected in SARS-CoV-2 infected people have to do with possible effects of the infection in the bio-psycho-social sphere. The population in the Autonomous Community of the Canary Islands has not been oblivious to it and, therefore, a need demanded by society has roared. A multicentre observational study will be carried out to assess the physical and functional status of people from the Canary Islands who, after being infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, suffer sequelae that persist after twelve weeks of infection. With help from the Official Association of Physiotherapists of the Canary Islands a call will be made to the population. This association will oversee the dissemination of the information and will recruit among its members the collaborating/evaluating physiotherapists, also ensuring the protection and preservation of the data to be collected. People meeting the established criteria will be referred to the more accessible collaborating centre of the canarian community, where, after a preliminary interview, participating patients will self-complete scientifically validated questionnaires, and will be subjected to different validated tests to evaluate their physical and functional status. Patients will be individually informed of the results of their evaluation, and they will receive a dossier with individualized recommendations. After this evaluation, a follow-up of the participants for up to 6 months is anticipated. Data will be recorded, analysed, and interpreted, and the results will be disseminated through conventional means of communication to society and also by attempting publication in scientific journals.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: At the Muniz Hospital, the Febrile Unit (UF) was established, a device that operates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Its implementation has demonstrated the importance of public policies in the health system, in addition to the possible development of epidemiological surveillance and monitoring strategies that provide health contributions. An analysis of the first two years of the pandemic at UF-Muniz was carried out. The objective of this unit is to determine which patients have poor prognostic criteria and define hospitalization. One of the most important characteristics of this UF is the care of a population with infectious diseases because this is a Hospital dedicated to this type of pathology. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional observational study was carried out with the objective of evaluating the hospitalizations made at UF-Muniz during the period between January 2020 and December 2021. RESULTS: 153 546 consultations were received, 2872 patients were admitted. In 2020, 1001 COVID-19 positive patients (76%) were admitted, 87 with tuberculosis (TB) (6.6%) and 102 with HIV (7.7%). In 2021, 991 positive COVID-19 patients (66%) were admitted, 151 with TB (10%) and 157 with HIV (10.5%) Conclusions: Only 1.9% of the consultations led to hospitalization, and the majority corresponded to COVID-19 positives, followed by HIV and TB cases in a smaller proportion. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obesity were the comorbidities that most frequently required hospitalization in COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
Context: Primary Care Research seeks to "meet our patients where they are" to make research more accessible and inclusive. During the COVID-19 pandemic, recruitment practices shifted. Letters, emails, phone calls took the place of in-person recruitment. Objective: Evaluate the effect of COVID-19 on recruitment demographics across primary care practices within a single health system for "The CAPTURE study: Validating a unique COPD case finding tool in primary care." Study Design and Analysis: Comparative analysis of demographics including race, gender, age from ten urban and rural clinics. The analysis included five practices with in-person recruitment pre-pandemic and 5 with virtual recruitment practices during the pandemic. Setting : Family and Internal Medicine practices, rural and urban. Population Studied: Patients (45-80, male and female) Intervention/Instrument: Before March 2020, pre-pandemic, our team focused on in-person recruitment. Clinicians' schedules were screened for patients who were then consented and enrolled during a clinic visit. After March 2020, our team transitioned to virtual recruit using a population report to identify patients. An email or mailed letter was sent to patients followed by a phone call. Outcome Measures: Percent enrolled relative to total clinic populations (pop). Results: In-person, 31.6% of enrollees were male compared to the clinic pop. of 41.5%. With virtual recruitment, 40.9% of enrollees were male compared to the clinic pop. of 39.9%. This gender difference was statistically significant (t-test p<0.05). In-person, 21.0% of enrollees were self-reported African American/Black (AA/Black) compared to the clinic pop. of 14.6%. With virtual recruitment, 18.1% of enrollees self-reported as AA/Black compared to the clinic pop. of 23.6%. In-person, 60.0% of enrollees were between the 45-64 compared to the clinic pop. of 55.0%. With virtual recruitment, 54.7% of enrollees were 45-64 compared to the clinic pop. of 60.8%. Although there was a trend toward fewer AA/Black enrollees and enrollees 45-64 through virtual recruitment, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion : During the COVID-19 pandemic, remote recruitment significantly increased the proportion of male participants but trended toward reduced proportion of AA/Black participants as well as those between the age of 45-64. These results suggest changing recruitment strategies between in person and virtual can alter recruitment outcomes. Copyright © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
ABSTRACT
Background: In Mexico, diabetes mellitus (DM) and diseases cardiovascular, register an upward trend. Objective: To estimate the number of complications due to cardiovascular events (CVD) and complications derived from DM (CDM) accumulated in beneficiaries of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) from 2019 to 2028, as well as the expense for medical and economic benefits in a scenario baseline and one of change in metabolic profile due to lack of medical follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods: The number of CVD and CDM was estimated from 2019, with a 10-year risk projection using the ESC CVD Risk Calculator and United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, considering risk factors registered in the institutional databases. Results: From 2019 to 2028, cumulative CVD cases were estimated at 2 million and those of CDM in 960 thousand, with an impact on medical spending of 439,523 million pesos and on the economic benefits of 174,085 millions. When considering the COVID-19 pandemic, CVD events and CDM increased by 589 thousand, with an increase in spending of 93,787 million pesos for medical care and 41,159 million for economic benefits. Conclusions: Without a comprehensive intervention in the management of CVD and CDM, the cost by both diseases will continue to increase, with financial pressures getting older. Copyright © 2023 Revista Medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.
ABSTRACT
In the context of the 80th anniversary of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), there are several health problems and challenges to be faced in relation to user population, which currently represents 42% of Mexico's population. Among these issues, once five waves of COVID-19 infections have passed and mortality rates have decreased, mental and behavioral disorders stand out as a re-emerging and priority problem. In response to this, in 2022 the Mental Health Comprehensive Program (MHCP, 2021-2024) materialized, which represents, for the first time, the opportunity to provide health services that address mental disorders and addictions of user's population IMSS, under the Primary Health Care model. That is, prioritizing health promotion, risk factors prevention, screening, timely diagnosis, and not just hospitalization and drug supply. Among the MHCP strategies, which motivated the writing of this document, we highlight the availability of reliable data, through the census of mental and behavioral disorders, related to important characteristics in terms of population, state, hospital, prevalence of disorders, in order to act accordingly through the infrastructure and human resources available at the IMSS, with emphasis on the first level of care. Copyright © 2023 Revista Medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.
ABSTRACT
Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased utilization of telemedicine. Patients with diabetes are a vulnerable population that require regular treatment and monitoring. Little is known about the impact visit modality on diabetes outcomes in an ambulatory setting. Objective: Compare proportions of patients with diabetes with uncontrolled diabetes among those with telemedicine versus in-person only ambulatory visits and examine differences by age, race, gender, ethnicity, and insurance. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting : The largest academic healthcare system in the state of Georgia with ambulatory clinics in urban, suburban and rural settings. Participants : Adults with diabetes scheduled for an ambulatory primary or specialty clinic visit between May 2020 and May 2021 were included. Patients were compared among three visit groups: those with all in-person visits, those with one telemedicine visit, and those with 2+ telemedicine visits. Demographics including age, race, ethnicity, gender, insurance status, and comorbidities were extracted from the electronic medical record. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary clinical outcome was uncontrolled diabetes, defined as HbAlc >= 9.0%. Chi-square test was used to determine crude differences in uncontrolled diabetes between visit groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess differences in uncontrolled diabetes between visit groups following risk adjustment. Results: A total of 18,148 ambulatory clinic visits for patients with diabetes were scheduled during the study period, and 11.6% had uncontrolled diabetes. There was no difference in proportion of patients with uncontrolled diabetes between all in-person visits (834 (11.6%)), one telemedicine visit (558 (11.8%)), or 2+ telemedicine visits (709 (11.4%)) (p = 0.80). Patients with 2+ telemedicine visits had significantly lower odds of uncontrolled diabetes compared to all in-person visits after adjusting for age, gender, race, ethnicity, insurance status, and comorbidities (OR: 0.88;95% CI: 0.79 - 0.99, p = 0.03). Conclusions and Relevance: Telemedicine visits were associated with a lower odds of uncontrolled diabetes. Further work is warranted to explore the relationship between telemedicine visits, equitable access to care, and diabetes outcomes. Copyright © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
ABSTRACT
Article presents a poem which relates a COVID-19 pandemic experience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
ABSTRACT
The Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS) developed and implemented epidemic monitoring and modeling tools to support the organization and planning of an adequate and timely response to the COVID-19 health emergency. The aim of this article is to describe the methodology and results of the early outbreak detection tool called COVID-19 Alert. An early warning traffic light was developed that uses time series analysis and a Bayesian method of early detection of outbreaks from electronic records on COVID-19 for suspected cases, confirmed cases, disabilities, hospitalizations, and deaths. Through Alerta COVID-19, the beginning of the fifth wave of COVID-19 in the IMSS was detected in a timely manner, three weeks before the official declaration. The proposed method is aimed at generating early warnings before the start of a new wave of COVID-19, monitoring the serious phase of the epidemic, and supporting decision-making within the institution;unlike other tools that have an approach aimed at communicating risks to the community. We can conclude that the Alerta COVID-19 is an agile tool that incorporates robust methods for the early detection of outbreaks. Copyright © 2023 Revista Medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.
ABSTRACT
Background: The third wave of COVID-19 in Mexico produced a high demand for hospital care, which is why it was created a multidisciplinary group to optimize decision-making: the Interinstitutional Command for the Health Sector (COISS, according to its initials in Spanish). So far, there is no scientific evidence of the COISS processes or their effect on the behavior of epidemiological indicators and the hospital care needs of the population in the context of COVID-19 in the entities involved. Objectives: To analyze the trend on epidemic risk indicators throughout the COISS group's management in the third wave of COVID-19 in Mexico. Material and methods: Mixed study: 1) non-systematic review of information from technical documents issued by COISS, 2) secondary analysis of open-access institutional databases through the description of healthcare needs of cases notified with COVID-19 symptoms, and an ecological analysis by each Mexican state on the behavior of hospital occupancy, RT-PCR positivity, and COVID-19 mortality in two-time points. Results: The COISS activity in identifying states with epidemic risk generated actions aimed at a reduction in hospital occupancy of beds, positivity by RT-PCR, and mortality from COVID-19. Conclusions : The decisions of the COISS group reduced the indicators of epidemic risk. Continuing the work of the COISS group is an urgent need. Conclusions: The decisions of the COISS group reduced the indicators of epidemic risk. Continuing the work of the COISS group is an urgent need. Copyright © 2023 Revista Medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic established a new challenge for health services in Mexico, which is why these services faced the challenge of responding to the affected people, by providing them services with opportunity, efficiency, effectiveness and safety. The Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS, Mexican Institute for Social Security) gave medical attention to the larger number of affected people: towards the end of September, 2022, 3,335,552 patients were registered, who represented 47% of the total (7,089,209) of confirmed COVID-19 cases since the beginning of the pandemic in 2020. Of all the cases treated, 295,065 (8.8%) required hospitalization. In addition of new scientific evidence and the implementation of best practices in medical care and directive management (with the general objective of improvement of the processes in hospital attention, even without an effective treatment at the time), we presented an evaluation, supervision method with a comprehensive (involving the three levels of health services) and analytic (structure, process, result and directive management components) approach. The achievement of specific goals and lines of action was established in a technical guideline with health policies for the COVID-19 medical care. These guidelines were instrumented with a standardized evaluation tool, a result dashboard and a risk assessment calculator, improving the quality of medical care and directive management by the multidisciplinary health team. Copyright © 2023 Revista Medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.
ABSTRACT
Two years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Mexican Institute for Social Security (IMSS, according to its initials in Spanish) rethought new projects focused on the new needs of the population and social security organizations and institutions. The Institute, as a cornerstone in the search for the wellbeing of Mexicans, aligned with the National Development Plan and the Strategic Health for Wellbeing Program, sought to direct its transformation towards a preventive, resilient, comprehensive, innovative, sustainable, modern and accessible IMSS. For this reason, the Medical Services Director designed the PRIISMA Project, as the one that over the next three years could make possible to innovate and improve its medical care processes, starting with the recovery of medical services and identifying those groups of beneficiaries who experience the most vulnerable circumstances. The PRIISMA project consisted of five sub-projects: 1. Vulnerable groups;2. Efficient and effective care;3. Prevent IMSS plus;4 IMSS University and 5. Recovery of medical services. The strategies of each project seek to improve medical care for all IMSS beneficiaries and users with a human rights perspective and by priority groups;the goal is reducing the gaps in access to health care, leaving no one behind and leaving no one out;and to surpass the goals for medical services provided before the pandemic. This document provides an overview of strategies and progress of the PRIISMA sub-projects achieved during 2022. Copyright © 2023 Revista Medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.
ABSTRACT
The Mexican Social Security Institute, the most prominent social security institution in Mexico, plays a significant role in Mexican health care. Throughout almost eight decades of existence, it has faced significant challenges, whose experiences have contributed to the generation of health policies in the country. Recently, the health emergency caused by COVID-19 evidenced a strong impact of the epidemiological transition associated with the high prevalence of chronic-degenerative diseases, which meant an increased risk of complications and death when facing emerging diseases. The institute is transformed through changes in its policies and forms of health care for the population to provide innovative responses and fulfill the commitment to provide social security to our country. Copyright © 2023 Revista Medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The incidence of COVID-19 infections among health professionals during the sixth wave has suffered an exponential increase, mainly due to the rapid community transmission caused by the Omicron variant. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the time to negativization in COVID-positive health professionals during the sixth wave, according to the PDIA result;and secondarily, to evaluate the possible influence of other factors (previous infection, vaccination, sex, age, job position) on the time to get negative status. METHODS: A descriptive, longitudinal, observational and retrospective study was carried out at Infanta Sofia University Hospital (Madrid, Spain). Made from the registry of the Occupational Risk Prevention Service of suspected or confirmed cases of SARS-COV-2 infection in health professionals, during the period between November 1, 2021 and February 28, 2022. Bivariate comparisons were made using Mann Whitney, Kruskal Wallis or Chi-square test (or exact test) according to variables. Subsequently, logistic regression (explanatory model) was performed. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of SARS-COV-2 infection in health professionals was 23.07%. The mean time to become negative was 9.94 days. Only the history of previous SARS-COV-2 infection had a statistically significant influence on the time to negativization of PDIA. The variables vaccination, sex and age had no effect on the time to negativization of PDIA. CONCLUSIONS: Professionals with a history of COVID-19 infection present lower times of negativization than those who had not have the disease. The results of our study confirm the immune escape of the vaccine against COVID-19, since more than 95% of those infected had received a complete vaccination schedule.
ABSTRACT
Context: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated public health measures have substantially increased stress on families, including financial stress. Objective: To explore the association between familial financial stress and child socioemotional and behavioural difficulties during the COVID-19 pandemic and examine parenting behaviour as a potential mediator to this relationship. Study Design and Analysis: Cross-sectional cohort study using online survey data. We used multivariable linear regression models to examine the association between parent-reported financial worry and child social and emotional health. We tested the role of parenting behaviour as a mediator. Setting or Dataset: Online survey data from the Cost of COVID study, primarily collected in Eastern Ontario, Canada. Population Studied: Parents over age 18 years caring for children under age 18 years. Instruments: Financial worry was measured with a 3-item measure assessing worry about maintaining housing, paying bills, and ability to purchase food. Parenting behaviours were assessed using Parenting Scale 8-item (PS-8) questionnaire. Outcome measure: Child social and emotional health was assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Total Difficulties Score. Results: Study sample of 528 parent and child pairs were from largely European ancestry (78%) and varied household income levels. The majority of parental respondents were female (93%). Increased financial worry during the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly associated with increased child SDQ total difficulties scores (beta = 0.23, SE = 0.10, p = 0.03). This relationship was mediated by parenting behaviour, independent of parent education, household income, parent age, parent sex, parent anxiety and child sex (Total Effect: beta = 0.69, p = 0.02, Average Causal Mediation Effects: beta = 0.50, p = 0.02, Average Direct Effects: estimate = 0.19, p = 0.08). Conclusion : Financial stress during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with poorer child social and emotional health. Unproductive parenting behaviours, including overreactivity and laxness, significantly mediated these effects. This work supports the importance of policies aimed to alleviate family financial stresses and highlights the potential impact such policies have on child health. Copyright © 2023 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this two-stage research was to document the stressors and resources experienced by front-line professional groups at the heart of the health crisis due to COVID-19, as well as to bring out of a multidisciplinary reflection, a series of priority proposals for strengthening the care system. Our results highlighted great interprofessional similarities in terms of negative and positive experiences (e.g., feeling of powerlessness, support among colleagues), as well as professional specificities (e.g., the painful feeling of being <<alone at the front>> among nurses). Although the stress, fatigue and/or lassitude factors cited by the participants were more numerous than the protective factors, several participants experienced an opportunity for personal and professional development. Overall, this research found that all front-line professionals have a role to play in improving and building resilience in the system, and that this role could be most effective if played in a context of increased multidisciplinary coordination and communication.